<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Astronomical Rating for WWE Raw &#8211; but Why? Let us know!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fightgameblog.com/2009/06/astronomical-rating-for-wwe-raw-but-why-let-us-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fightgameblog.com/2009/06/astronomical-rating-for-wwe-raw-but-why-let-us-know/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s On Like Donkey Kong</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:31:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Big D</title>
		<link>http://fightgameblog.com/2009/06/astronomical-rating-for-wwe-raw-but-why-let-us-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>Big D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightgameblog.com/?p=3365#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mr. Wight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mr. Wight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Show</title>
		<link>http://fightgameblog.com/2009/06/astronomical-rating-for-wwe-raw-but-why-let-us-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator>Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightgameblog.com/?p=3365#comment-1783</guid>
		<description>My theory is that it&#039;s, of course, a combination of those factors. Much like any one of the &quot;special&quot; Raw episodes that get 3 hours, people tune expecting something huge to happen. The draw is that they don&#039;t know what the hell that could possibly be.

So in this case, you have an episode with the opportunity to be taken in a completely different direction than ever before with Trump in the driver seat. And truth be told, they started out doing good things. It felt like a nice shake up, which is always good for business. Whenever they have someone in a position of control that isn&#039;t necessarily a &quot;part of the business&quot; (Adamle, Vicky, now Trump) it gives them free reign to book with outlandish ideas. So that potential, I believe, kept people hooked too.

Also take into account the fact that Main Event took place at the end of the first hour. A main event that should have, by all means, headlined this transitional PPV. So I figure people, myself included, were feeling &quot;hell, if they put this on now then something Even Bigger just has to happen!&quot; 

I&#039;ve had people who know how much of a dirty smark I am ask me if the Trump buyout was legit as well, so there was some basic intrigue and curiosity that bubbled up for casuals in that respect.

But yeah, overall, I share feelings with the people here. The show did not live up to the hype for the most part. Smackdown, once again, sadly, had some of the more interesting bits on a Raw show. I honestly can&#039;t believe they weren&#039;t ballsy enough to let the angle pan out for at least a few weeks. Which makes it seem like the ultimately jumped the gun in the first place. I don&#039;t know, maybe it&#039;s a part of an Even Larger angle. We&#039;ll see I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My theory is that it&#8217;s, of course, a combination of those factors. Much like any one of the &#8220;special&#8221; Raw episodes that get 3 hours, people tune expecting something huge to happen. The draw is that they don&#8217;t know what the hell that could possibly be.</p>
<p>So in this case, you have an episode with the opportunity to be taken in a completely different direction than ever before with Trump in the driver seat. And truth be told, they started out doing good things. It felt like a nice shake up, which is always good for business. Whenever they have someone in a position of control that isn&#8217;t necessarily a &#8220;part of the business&#8221; (Adamle, Vicky, now Trump) it gives them free reign to book with outlandish ideas. So that potential, I believe, kept people hooked too.</p>
<p>Also take into account the fact that Main Event took place at the end of the first hour. A main event that should have, by all means, headlined this transitional PPV. So I figure people, myself included, were feeling &#8220;hell, if they put this on now then something Even Bigger just has to happen!&#8221; </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had people who know how much of a dirty smark I am ask me if the Trump buyout was legit as well, so there was some basic intrigue and curiosity that bubbled up for casuals in that respect.</p>
<p>But yeah, overall, I share feelings with the people here. The show did not live up to the hype for the most part. Smackdown, once again, sadly, had some of the more interesting bits on a Raw show. I honestly can&#8217;t believe they weren&#8217;t ballsy enough to let the angle pan out for at least a few weeks. Which makes it seem like the ultimately jumped the gun in the first place. I don&#8217;t know, maybe it&#8217;s a part of an Even Larger angle. We&#8217;ll see I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GG</title>
		<link>http://fightgameblog.com/2009/06/astronomical-rating-for-wwe-raw-but-why-let-us-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1782</link>
		<dc:creator>GG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightgameblog.com/?p=3365#comment-1782</guid>
		<description>I can kind of see a few things happening.

They booked the show as important. It was advertised fairly well. Let&#039;s say that&#039;s worth .1. Vince McMahon in his first real appearance back is always good for a couple points. Let&#039;s say he&#039;s worth .2. Let&#039;s say Donald Trump is worth .2. 

That&#039;s still only .5 points and I can&#039;t see how that rating shot up a full point. The lack of commercial breaks would&#039;ve meant nothing to me as a viewer. The thing that kept me watching was Vince&#039;s comedy.

So I&#039;m still suspicious. I&#039;m looking forward to seeing the breakdowns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can kind of see a few things happening.</p>
<p>They booked the show as important. It was advertised fairly well. Let&#8217;s say that&#8217;s worth .1. Vince McMahon in his first real appearance back is always good for a couple points. Let&#8217;s say he&#8217;s worth .2. Let&#8217;s say Donald Trump is worth .2. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s still only .5 points and I can&#8217;t see how that rating shot up a full point. The lack of commercial breaks would&#8217;ve meant nothing to me as a viewer. The thing that kept me watching was Vince&#8217;s comedy.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m still suspicious. I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing the breakdowns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big D</title>
		<link>http://fightgameblog.com/2009/06/astronomical-rating-for-wwe-raw-but-why-let-us-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>Big D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightgameblog.com/?p=3365#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>Good point Matt

As for GG - if you are right and the real number comes out any lower than 4, WWE will be in tears</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Matt</p>
<p>As for GG &#8211; if you are right and the real number comes out any lower than 4, WWE will be in tears</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GG</title>
		<link>http://fightgameblog.com/2009/06/astronomical-rating-for-wwe-raw-but-why-let-us-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>GG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightgameblog.com/?p=3365#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still not sure I believe that number is right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still not sure I believe that number is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattM</title>
		<link>http://fightgameblog.com/2009/06/astronomical-rating-for-wwe-raw-but-why-let-us-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>MattM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightgameblog.com/?p=3365#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>A combination of weak summer programming on the bigger networks(repeats and crappy shows) and people flipping though and seeing Trump wondering what the fuck is going on. Plus both the NHL and NBA playoffs are over so there was basically zero sports competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A combination of weak summer programming on the bigger networks(repeats and crappy shows) and people flipping though and seeing Trump wondering what the fuck is going on. Plus both the NHL and NBA playoffs are over so there was basically zero sports competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big D</title>
		<link>http://fightgameblog.com/2009/06/astronomical-rating-for-wwe-raw-but-why-let-us-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>Big D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightgameblog.com/?p=3365#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>Cool Cool - Two good theories. Is Donald really that big on a pop radar? 

Paul - If it were 2000, I&#039;d agree 100%.  But with that crappy, boring show, they gave people tons of time to switch it off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool Cool &#8211; Two good theories. Is Donald really that big on a pop radar? </p>
<p>Paul &#8211; If it were 2000, I&#8217;d agree 100%.  But with that crappy, boring show, they gave people tons of time to switch it off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Miller</title>
		<link>http://fightgameblog.com/2009/06/astronomical-rating-for-wwe-raw-but-why-let-us-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightgameblog.com/?p=3365#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>Well, people are creatures of habit, they usually go surfing around during the breaks, there were no breaks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, people are creatures of habit, they usually go surfing around during the breaks, there were no breaks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Garzoli</title>
		<link>http://fightgameblog.com/2009/06/astronomical-rating-for-wwe-raw-but-why-let-us-know/comment-page-1/#comment-1770</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Garzoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightgameblog.com/?p=3365#comment-1770</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m flabbergasted by the Raw rating also, I didn&#039;t think the show deserved the rating it got but my guess Donald Trump &quot;buying raw&quot; intrigued people</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m flabbergasted by the Raw rating also, I didn&#8217;t think the show deserved the rating it got but my guess Donald Trump &#8220;buying raw&#8221; intrigued people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

